Watching a nation of fewer than 50,000 people—a country appearing in its first-ever FIFA World Cup—pushing the reigning champions to the brink for 110 minutes was a masterclass in what a focused, unified society can achieve. For nearly two hours of grueling football, it was a 2-2 draw. It was a display of heart, strategy, and collective effort. I’m not from there, but I found myself wishing I was.

It’s a stark, painful contrast to the state of Indian football, where we’ve somehow mastered the art of losing to Nepal and Bangladesh in the qualifying rounds.

It makes you wonder: why can a tiny island nation foster the discipline and unity required to compete on the world stage, while a country of over a billion people is instead preoccupied with tearing itself apart?

The answer, unfortunately, is as visible as it is tragic. While other nations are investing in their youth and their infrastructure, our most "famous" influencers—those with millions of followers and pockets lined with YouTube ad revenue—are running a masterclass in professionalized bigotry.

They’ve discovered that teaching hatred toward minorities, and manufacturing venom for our neighbors in Pakistan and Bangladesh, is far more profitable than talking about why our national team can’t beat Nepal. The BJP has weaponized this, injecting a slow-acting poison into the minds of the electorate to win elections by keeping everyone at each other's throats.

When you look at the follower counts on these hate-spewing channels, you start to fear the country has gone completely insane. An uneducated, frustrated population is being fed a steady diet of hysteria because it’s easier to control people who have lost the ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

It’s a brilliant, cynical strategy for the party in power, but it’s a suicide pact for the country. We are trading our potential, our global standing, and our social fabric for the temporary high of religious division. 

Sometimes, I look at that scoreboard—Cape Verde 2, Argentina 3—and I don't just see a football match. I see a mirror reflecting everything we aren't, and I find myself wondering exactly where this path is leading us.

Given that you see this diversion of national energy as the primary barrier to India reaching its potential, do you see any realistic pathway—perhaps through intellectual or civic leadership—for the country to reclaim a narrative based on merit and unity rather than division?

000

Washington, June 23 (UNI)

US President Donald Trump is set to face Republican senators on Capitol Hill on Wednesday amid growing tensions over his push for the SAVE America Act and a controversial agreement with Iran.

The meeting, arranged by Senator Rick Scott, comes at a time when relations between the White House and several GOP senators are at their lowest point of Trump's second term.

Republicans are bracing for a candid and potentially heated discussion on issues that have divided the party in recent weeks.

The sharpest disagreement concerns Trump's demand that Senate Republicans find a way to pass the SAVE America Act, his top legislative priority. Trump has urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to abolish or weaken the filibuster to overcome Democratic opposition.

However, Thune has repeatedly resisted the idea, arguing that there are not enough Republican votes to change Senate rules. "Senator Thune, to his credit, has told him the truth and that is we don't have the votes," Senstor John Cornyn said, US media reported.

Cornyn also criticized fellow Republicans for encouraging expectations that the legislation could still pass. "I think Mike Lee is contributing to this fantasy that somehow it's going to happen," The Hill quoted him as saying.
The meeting is also expected to focus on the Trump administration's memorandum of understanding with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Many Senate Republicans have expressed frustration over the lack of a detailed briefing on the agreement and remain skeptical about its terms.

The outcome of Wednesday's meeting could shape Republican unity heading into a crucial legislative and political period.

000

Burgenstock, (Switzerland)

The first round of negotiations between the United States and Iran aimed at reaching a final agreement concluded on a "positive note", with mediators Qatar and Pakistan saying that "encouraging progress" had been made during the talks.

The discussions began on Sunday in Switzerland following last week's initial agreement between Washington and Tehran. Technical-level talks are scheduled to continue throughout the week.

In a joint statement issued early Monday, Qatar and Pakistan announced there is a consensus on making a "High Level Committee" that will pave a roadmap for reaching a final deal within 60 days. The mediators also said a "line of communication" for the Strait of Hormuz and a high-level committee to oversee mediation efforts were being established.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi described the talks as having delivered "major progress" toward ending the conflict in Lebanon.

According to the memorandum, Iran will use its "best efforts" to ensure "safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge" from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa.

The Strait of Hormuz has remained a major point of leverage for Iran throughout the negotiations. On Saturday, Iran's military command announced it would close the strategic waterway in response to Israel's continued attacks in Lebanon and what it described as the United States "failing to implement" the agreement aimed at ending the war.

When the talks were underway, US President Donald Trump nearly derailed the negotiations when he threatened to "take over the Strait" during remarks to Fox News on Sunday.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), signed on June 18, commits both sides to reaching a final agreement within 60 days. It also calls for an end to fighting on "all fronts", including in Lebanon, and for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

The mediators' joint statement said that a "communication line" had been established "to avoid incidents and miscommunication with the aim of safe passage for commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz".

Both sides also agreed to establish a "de-confliction cell" involving the United States, Iran, and Lebanon, facilitated by Qatar and Pakistan, to help end military operations in Lebanon.

Following the conclusion of the talks in Switzerland, Araghchi said sanctions on Iran's oil exports had been waived and that some Iranian assets frozen abroad had been released.

In a post on X, he also stated that "a major reconstruction and development plan for Iran has been launched".

However, the post did not provide details regarding the frozen assets or the reconstruction programme.

In a separate statement, the media committee representing the Iranian delegation said Iran and Qatar had signed a new memorandum of understanding governing the release of Tehran's frozen assets, according to Iran's semi-official Fars news agency.

Since the MoU was signed, fighting between Hezbollah and Israeli forces in southern Lebanon has intensified, while Israeli airstrikes have reportedly killed dozens of Lebanese civilians, including women and children.

The escalation prompted the United States to broker a new ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah on Friday. Continued clashes and airstrikes led Iran on Saturday to announce the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, although vessel-tracking data indicated that commercial shipping continued to pass through the waterway.

Earlier, as the talks began in the Swiss city of Lucerne, Trump posted that Iran "must immediately stop their highly paid PROXIES in Lebanon from causing trouble" and warned that the United States would "hit Iran very hard again" if Tehran failed to comply.

Araghchi reiterated that sanctions on Iran's oil sector had been lifted and that some of the country's frozen overseas assets had been released. He again stated that "a major reconstruction and development plan for Iran has been launched".

Trump's earlier comments angered Iran's negotiating team and briefly stalled the talks. The US president told Fox News that Washington could resume bombing Iran and "take over" the Strait of Hormuz if an agreement was not reached.

The United States and Iran agreed to establish a "de-confliction cell", facilitated by Qatar and Pakistan, to ensure an end to military operations in Lebanon, according to the mediators.

The conflict between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement has remained a major obstacle to a broader agreement, with Tehran insisting that deadly Israeli strikes must cease.

Iran's lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, responded sharply to Trump's threats, saying: "Don't they think that if their threats had any effect, they wouldn't be in this desperate situation today?... No matter how much they talk, it is we who take action."

On Sunday, reports indicated that fighting had diminished. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that Israeli forces would remain in southern Lebanon for as long as necessary to protect northern Israel.

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected any Israeli military presence in southern Lebanon and said the group would defend itself.

Speaking before the talks at the Swiss resort of Bürgenstock, US lead negotiator and Vice President JD Vance said Trump had instructed negotiators to "turn over a new leaf".

Vance added that if Iran's leadership were willing to abandon its role as a "driver of regional instability" and give up its "nuclear weapons ambitions for the longer term", then the United States "is willing to fundamentally transform our relationship with that country."

Iran, however, has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful. US Vice President JD Vance said that the US was ready to "turn over a new leaf" with Iran if Tehran's leadership gives up its nuclear ambitions and stops "being a driver of regional instability".

Speaking ahead of peace talks with Iran, Pakistan and Qatar at the Bürgenstock Swiss resort, Vance also added that progress has been made in ending hostilities in Lebanon.

"Can we turn over a new leaf? Can we change relations in the Middle East permanently?" Vance asked. "What we're trying to accomplish here is something very simple: through diplomacy and through working together, to transform the Middle East."

000

London, Agency

Keir Starmer on Monday announced his resignation as Prime Minister and leader of the Labour Party in an emotional address outside 10 Downing Street. Starmer said that throughout his time in office, every decision had been made with the intention of “putting the country I love first.” Appearing visibly emotional, he thanked his wife, Victoria, describing her as his “rock,” and said he now looked forward to focusing on being a better father to his children after leaving office.

He acknowledged that he was not the best person to lead Labour into the next general election, saying he accepted that view “with good grace.”

Starmer confirmed he would remain in office on a temporary basis until the Labour Party elects a new leader. He has asked the party’s National Executive Committee to complete the leadership process before Parliament returns in September. Under the proposed timetable, nominations would open on July 9 and continue through the summer recess.

He also said he had informed the King of his decision earlier in the day and pledged to ensure an orderly transition of power, adding that he would support his successor.

“The question being asked now is not who was best placed to change the Labour Party, to take us into power and begin the vital work of improving lives for millions of people. Those questions have been answered,” he said. “The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election.”

“I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace. Every decision I’ve taken has been about putting the country I love first. That is why I will resign as leader of the Labour Party.”

Senior Labour figure Andy Burnham is among those being discussed as possible successors and is expected in Westminster following his recent by-election victory.

In his statement, Starmer reflected on his tenure, saying he had restored trust in government, strengthened national security, and reformed the Labour Party. He also expressed pride in leading the party back into government after years in opposition.

Despite leading Labour to a decisive victory in the 2024 general election, Starmer has faced growing internal dissent following controversies and policy reversals, which critics say have weakened public confidence in his government.

Pressure has been on Starmer to resign in recent months and escalated sharply after Labour rival Andy Burnham won a parliamentary seat on Friday.

000

Jerusalem, June 18 (UNI)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly seeking to influence the next phase of US-Iran negotiations by rallying support among conservative media personalities and pro-Israel lawmakers in Washington, according to a CNN report.

Netanyahu and many members of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, have remained deeply sceptical of Iran’s intentions throughout the diplomatic process, arguing that Tehran is not negotiating in good faith and is unlikely to make meaningful concessions regarding its nuclear programme.

Israel has neither publicly endorsed the memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached between Washington and Tehran nor participated directly in the negotiations that produced the agreement. The exclusion has further fuelled concerns and scepticism within Israeli political and security circles.

Although the MoU has initiated a 60-day period of negotiations aimed at reaching a comprehensive settlement, Netanyahu reportedly believes that a final agreement remains far from certain.

According to sources cited by CNN, the Israeli leader is working to strengthen opposition to the deal among influential conservative voices in Washington and within Republican political circles.

Among the agreement’s vocal critics is conservative commentator and pro-Israel broadcaster Mark Levin, who described the deal as one that “doesn't make any sense” and criticised the proposed reconstruction fund for Iran as a “slush fund.”

Netanyahu is also expected to rely on support from pro-Israel members of the US Congress to shape the debate surrounding the ongoing negotiations.

However, not all Republican lawmakers share the same concerns. Several GOP figures who previously advocated a tougher stance on Iran have expressed support for the diplomatic process. Senator Lindsey Graham, a leading Republican voice on national security issues, stated earlier this week that an agreement with Iran “will be beneficial to the United States.”

The CNN report further stated that Netanyahu has informed President Donald Trump that Israel does not consider itself bound by provisions in the MoU related to Lebanon. Those provisions reportedly call for the immediate withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) from southern Lebanon and a permanent cessation of hostilities across all fronts.

While Israel has scaled back some military operations in Lebanon under pressure from Washington, Israeli officials have maintained that military forces will remain deployed until the threat posed by Hezbollah is adequately addressed.

Officials from Israel and Lebanon continue discussions on possible arrangements to resolve tensions linked to the Iran-backed militant group and to prevent further escalation along the border.

Kazan (Russia), June 18 (UNI)

ASEAN member states and Russia have agreed to deepen cooperation in energy security, liquefied natural gas (LNG), civilian nuclear power, and low-carbon technologies as both sides seek to enhance resilience against growing disruptions in global energy markets.

The agreement was formalised in a joint statement adopted at a summit in Kazan commemorating the 35th anniversary of ASEAN-Russia relations. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Russia pledged to elevate energy cooperation into a strategic pillar of their partnership.

The move comes amid increasing concerns over energy insecurity driven by geopolitical tensions, supply-chain disruptions, and market volatility, which both sides said threaten economic resilience and sustainable development.

Under the agreement, ASEAN and Russia will expand trade, investment, and long-term commercial partnerships in oil, natural gas, LNG, and electricity. The two sides also committed to strengthening coordination on energy security, emergency preparedness, and supply stability.

The declaration outlines broader cooperation in energy-transition technologies, including renewable energy, hydrogen, energy efficiency, carbon-abatement solutions, and nuclear power.

A major feature of the agreement is the commitment to explore mutually agreed areas of civilian nuclear cooperation. These include emerging technologies such as small modular reactors (SMRs), nuclear safety and security management, regulatory frameworks, workforce development, and emergency preparedness.

The statement acknowledged Russia’s role as a major global energy supplier and reaffirmed support for ASEAN’s regional energy priorities under the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2026–2030.

Both sides also endorsed efforts to strengthen regional energy connectivity through ASEAN-led initiatives, including the ASEAN Power Grid and the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline. They agreed to explore joint studies, investments, and cooperation in energy transportation, storage infrastructure, and cross-border energy networks.

“Secure, affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy systems are critical to growth, resilience, and the implementation of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045,” the joint statement said.

The declaration further reaffirmed support for open, transparent, and inclusive energy markets while calling for stronger protection of critical energy infrastructure, secure supply chains, and uninterrupted maritime trade routes.

The partnership will be implemented through the Comprehensive Plan of Action to Implement the ASEAN-Russian Federation Strategic Partnership 2026–2030 and the ASEAN-Russia Energy Work Plan 2026–2030.

Washington/Tehran, June 18 (UNI)

Senior US officials have clarified that Iran will not automatically gain access to frozen assets, sanctions relief, or a multibillion-dollar economic reconstruction package merely by signing the upcoming memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Washington.

The clarification follows the release of the 14-point memorandum on Wednesday, which prompted varying and sometimes contradictory interpretations in both Washington and Tehran.

During a background briefing, US officials emphasized that the MoU is a broad framework designed to facilitate future negotiations rather than a final agreement. As such, it does not commit the United States to providing immediate economic benefits. Any incentives, they said, would be contingent upon Iran’s compliance and measurable progress toward a comprehensive settlement, according to Iran International.

Officials also rejected claims circulating in Iranian media that the agreement would unlock substantial financial gains before a final deal is reached.

Addressing the provision outlining a reconstruction and economic development plan valued at at least $300 billion, they stressed that the text does not obligate Washington to provide post-war funding or direct financial assistance. Instead, the clause establishes a pathway toward potential sanctions relief if Iran fulfills its commitments, potentially encouraging future investment from governments and private-sector entities.

The officials further noted that any sanctions relief would be tied to verifiable advances in addressing concerns over Iran’s nuclear programme. Economic benefits, they said, would be granted only in exchange for meaningful nuclear concessions, including measures related to Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Regarding Iran’s frozen assets, the Trump administration stated that the MoU links any asset release to the implementation of the agreement and progress in broader negotiations. Officials said Tehran had already accepted provisions stipulating that no funds would be released automatically and that access would depend entirely on Iranian compliance and demonstrations of good faith.

While some funds could potentially be made available during the negotiation process, officials stressed that this would occur only if Iran undertakes specific actions requested by Washington.

US officials also dismissed broader interpretations of the memorandum’s provisions concerning the Strait of Hormuz, stating that the agreement focuses on reopening the strategic waterway and restoring commercial shipping rather than creating a broader Gulf security framework.

On military matters, officials said Washington has no immediate plans to reduce its military presence in the region following the signing of the memorandum. Any future adjustments would depend on Iran’s adherence to the agreement and progress in negotiations.

The officials highlighted the importance of direct communication channels established during the conflict between US forces and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), noting that these channels helped reduce misunderstandings and facilitated diplomatic contacts during and after the conflict.

They also rejected suggestions that nuclear issues had been excluded from the memorandum, pointing out that the text explicitly commits both sides to discussions on Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and broader nuclear activities.

The memorandum is expected to be formally signed on Friday, after which negotiations aimed at reaching a final settlement are scheduled to begin.

000

Beirut, Jun 18 (UNI)

Nearly 4,000 people have been killed in Lebanon so far due to Israeli military operations against Hezbollah militants, according to numbers released by Lebanon's Ministry of Public Health today.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) found itself entangled in a parallel war with the Iran-backed Islamist group on March 2, when Israel launched major retaliatory attacks in southern Lebanon in response to the militia's barrage of rocket and drone fire at Israel, following the outbreak of the joint US-Israel war against Iran on February 28.

Since hostilities erupted between the IDF and Hezbollah, at least 3,912 people have been killed and 11,873 others wounded, the ministry said, though its numbers did not differentiate between combatants and non-combatants.
Following the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran, both sides were required to immediately put a halt to fighting on all fronts, including in Lebanon, which Iran has identified as a key component of the agreement, having repeatedly maintained that the IDF's continued presence in the region constituted a direct violation of the deal.

However, Israel's military today said that forces would remain in Lebanon and continue operating against Hezbollah, with Netanyahu actively stressing that Jerusalem will not withdraw from southern Lebanon, and will maintain its security zone there as long as required.

"We will restore security and prosperity to northern towns," he said during an official ceremony concerning Route 60, a north-south highway stretching from Nazareth to Beersheba that runs through the West Bank.
"That requires maintaining the security zone in southern Lebanon; it requires that we not leave there, as long as Israel's security needs require it."

His adamant insistence came following heavy criticism by US President Donald Trump this week, who bashed the IDF's operations against Hezbollah as being far too aggressive.

Jerusalem is currently negotiating with Washington as it seeks to keep forces deployed in southern Lebanon amid the country's parallel fight against Hezbollah, which the US-Iran agreement says must now end. Iran had said that Israeli forces remaining in Lebanon would be considered a violation of the deal.

000

Kananaskis, June 17

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump held high-level bilateral discussions on the sidelines of the G7 Summit, reaffirming their commitment to strengthening India-US relations through enhanced trade, defense collaboration, and strategic cooperation.

The meeting focused on accelerating negotiations for a mutually beneficial trade agreement aimed at boosting bilateral commerce and addressing key market access concerns. Both leaders emphasized the importance of expanding economic ties and creating new opportunities for businesses and investors in both countries.

Modi and Trump also discussed deepening cooperation in critical sectors, including defense, emerging technologies, energy security, artificial intelligence, and semiconductor manufacturing. The leaders underscored the growing importance of the India-US partnership in ensuring stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.

Regional and global security issues featured prominently during the talks, with both sides exchanging views on geopolitical developments, counterterrorism efforts, and strengthening strategic coordination on international platforms.

The meeting highlighted the continued momentum in India-US relations, with both leaders expressing optimism about advancing shared priorities and enhancing collaboration across multiple sectors.

Officials from both countries described the discussions as constructive and forward-looking, reflecting the strategic significance of the partnership between the world's largest democracies.

000